Soon after the
introduction of penicillin in the early 1940s, there were reports that
penicillin treatment for enterococcal endocarditis produced worse outcomes than
penicillin treatment for streptococcal endocarditis . It is consistent
with this observation that enterococci are considerably less susceptible to
penicillins than streptococci. For example, for E. faecalis, the minimal
inhibitory concentration (MICs) of penicillin is usually 8 µg per milliliter, and for E.
faecium, until recently, it was 4 to 32 µg per milliliter; the concentrations of ampicillin that are
needed to inhibit enterococci are about half those of penicillin. It usually
takes much more penicillin (often more than 100 µg per milliliter) to kill an enterococcus than to inhibit it,
and this lack of bactericidal (killing) activity presumably explains the
poor efficacy of penicillin (and vancomycin) as mono therapy for patients with
enterococcal endocarditis. Even those enterococci that are susceptible to
killing by penicillin can develop tolerance to this bactericidal effect. The
greater clinical efficacy in treating enterococcal endocarditis with the use of
penicillin plus streptomycin (despite low-level in vitro resistance to
the latter) was reflected in vitro by the presence of synergism and a
bactericidal effect.
This finding led to
the recognition of this combination as the standard of care, despite the
toxicity of streptomycin. Among other antimicrobial drugs, none are more
effective against enterococci than ampicillin or penicillin, and indeed,
enterococci are, as a group, inherently resistant to cephalosporins,
antistaphylococcal penicillins, low concentrations of clindamycin and
aminoglycosides, and in vivo trimethoprim. Thus, for decades, the
regimen of choice for patients with enterococcal endocarditis has been
penicillin or ampicillin (with substitution of vancomycin in a patient allergic
to penicillin or for the occasional ampicillin-resistant enterococcus ARE)
combined with an aminoglycoside. Mono-therapy with penicillin, ampicillin, or
vancomycin has appeared to be sufficient for most other enterococcal
infections.
Intrinsic
resistance includes enterococci that exhibit a low-level resistance to many of
the antibiotics used for Gram-positive infections. The genes for intrinsic
resistance, like other species characteristics, appear to reside on the
chromosome. The various intrinsic (inherent) traits expressed by enterococci
include resistance to semisynthetic penicillinase-resistant penicillins,
cephalosporins, low levels of aminoglycosides, and low levels of clindamycin.
Ampicillin and penicillin G are somewhat more effective against enterococci
than other β-lactams.
A tolerance
phenomenon also can occur with β-lactams. Streptococci show MICs that are 10 to
100 times lower than those for enterococci. Resistance to cephalosporins is
relatively greater than for ampicillin or penicillin, making cephalosporins a
poor choice for treatment. The E. faecium species appears to have a
higher intrinsic resistance to β--lactams than other species. A low-level
intrinsic resistance also is seen with aminoglycosides due to decreased ability
of the antibiotic to penetrate the outer cell envelope of enterococci. This
penetration is necessary for the antimicrobial actions of the aminoglycoside,
since the drug acts intracellularly. Synergistic combinations of cell-wall
active antibiotics (eg, penicillins, carbapenems, or glycopeptides with
aminoglycosides) are useful when bactericidal activity is needed as in the
treatment of bacteremia, endocarditis, or meningitis. E faecalis appears
to have a higher level of intrinsic resistance to aminoglycosides than other
species. Enterococci are marginally susceptible to fluoroquinolones and are not
susceptible in vivo to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim due to endogenous
sources of folate.
Clindamycin
generally is considered to be inactive against enterococcal organisms at
clinically achievable concentrations. Antibiotics other than those used for
Gram-positive infections and aminoglycosides have shown limited efficacy in the
treatment of enterococci.
No comments:
Post a Comment