Spread in hospitals
Several studies
have demonstrated the ability of resistant strains of enterococci to prevail
and spread in hospitals. Enterococci are able to colonize not only the gut but
also the skin, oral cavity and lungs of hospitalized patients.
The intrinsic
robustness of E. faecalis may allow members of this species to survive
for extended periods of time, leading to its persistence and nosocomial spread.
E. faecalis can grow at 10 to 45 ºC, in 6.5 % NaCl, in the presence of
40 % bile salts and over a broad range of pH.
Originally,
enterococcal infections were thought to arise from a patient’s own endogenous
microbiota or to be introduced into the abdomen during transplant surgery or
its complications .
However, molecular
epidemiological studies provided evidence for epidemic spread of enterococci in
a hospital setting and nosocomial acquisition of enterococci. Long duration of
stay in hospitals, stay in units with high proportions of colonized patients,
use of electronic thermometers, and diarrhea have all been factors associated
with spread of resistant strains. All these experiences make obvious the
importance of having efficient infection-control routines in hospitals. Use of
surveillance, isolation and barrier precautions has been successful in
controlling minor outbreaks in non-endemic situations.
Livornese et al.
were the first to document an inanimate object, in this case rectal thermometer
probes, as the mode of transmission of a vancomycin resistant E. faecium.
Removal of the rectal thermometer probes resulted in termination of the
outbreak. These reports were followed by many reports on nosocomial outbreaks
and transmission of antibiotic resistant enterococci. The hands of health care
workers are efficient tools for spreading microorganisms between patients in
hospitals, this is true also for resistant enterococci. The impact of
hand-washing has not been uniformly positive in US studies, possibly because
use of gloves sometimes seems to have replaced hand-washing. Half a minute of
wash with 60% alcohol solutions was more effective in eradicating VRE from the
hands than was soap and water. E. faecium isolates survive for 7 days on
counter tops, 24 hours on bedrails, 60 minutes
on telephones and 30 minutes on stethoscopes. Rectal thermometers and even
blood pressure cuffs have been involved in the
spread of VRE. One recent study showed the environment to be contaminated
around VRE colonized patients, another that the
hands of medical staff may be equally easy
contaminated with VRE by environmental contacts and colonized patients.
These findings
illustrate the importance of proper cleaning of devices shared between patients
and the use of hand disinfectants both before and after patient contact when
trying to control spread of resistant bacteria in hospitals. Recently it was
demonstrated that VRE could be controlled in a large region with 32 health care
facilities, provided that consequent and active infection control measures
including surveillance cultures and isolation of all infected and colonized
patients were carried out. In that region, the overall prevalence of VRE
decreased from 2.2% to 0.5% within 2 years.
On the other hand,
if smaller outbreaks are not controlled the situation may become complex and
even endemic. Bonten and coworkers studied VRE epidemiology in an ICU and
introduced the term “colonization pressure” meaning the proportion of colonized
patients in a setting during a given period. They found that if the
colonization pressure was >50% all other measures had only little impact on
the time to acquisition of VRE. In endemic setting measures such as protection
of high risk groups, reduction of the total antibiotic pressure and education
of staff may be more important than surveillance and isolation of every
patient.
Risk factors for
the nosocomial acquisition of enterococci that are described in the majority of
studies are: previous antimicrobial therapy, duration of hospitalization,
severe underlying disease, or invasive procedures. Nosocomial enterococcal
acquisition and infection are often due to superinfection after the use of
antibiotics with little or no anti-enterococcal activity like cephalosporins or
quinolones.
Prevention and
control of transmission include the controlled use of antibiotics, active
surveillance cultures to identify the reservoir for spread and stringent
application of recommended contact precautions. A variant of the esp gene
was detected in all epidemic vancomycin-resistant E. faecium in
hospitals, but not in non-epidemic animal isolates. This indicates that the
surface protein Esp is associated with enterococcal colonization and spread.
Analysis of the mechanism underlying the influence of this surface protein on
enterococcal transmission might lead to new ways to prevent colonization and
transmission.
No comments:
Post a Comment